《哈姆雷特》讀后感（精選3篇）

《哈姆雷特》讀后感 篇1

　　沙翁的《哈姆雷特》是一部經典的代表作.這本書在表面情節上與歷史的傳說并沒有多大的區別,講的還是丹麥王子為父報仇的故事,其中充滿了血腥暴力和死亡.正如劇中人霍拉旭所說:" 你們可以聽到奸淫殘殺,反常修理的行為,冥冥中的判決,意外的屠戮,借手殺人的狡計,以及陷入自害的結局." 曲折選宕的情節,緊緊圍繞著復仇而展開.哈姆雷特從德國的威登堡匆匆趕回國內,是來參加他父親的葬禮的,使他不能接受的是,他未趕上父親的葬禮,卻目睹了母親與叔叔克勞迪斯的婚禮,這已使哈姆萊特疑竇在心,加之夜晚在王宮城堡的露臺上與父親的亡魂相見,亡魂哀訴,這樁暴行是哈姆雷特的叔叔所為,并要他為父報仇.至此,他開始了艱難的復仇歷程,與克勞迪斯展開了你死我活的較量.最終,向克勞迪斯發出了復仇之劍.

　　在沙翁所有的作品里，《哈姆雷特》或許是最受爭議的一部，也是最受注目的一部。你在16歲時或許會被《羅米歐與朱麗葉》感動得瀟然淚下，卻覺得《暴風雨》不知所云;當你60歲時，又可能深深地被后者所帶有的神秘主義色彩所打動而對人生有所感悟，而前者卻已經無法再次激起你心中的波瀾……但是無論你在人生的哪一個階段，當你經歷了一場豐富而深刻的精神生活，當你提升了自己的人格，重新發現了一個全新的自我，你總是能在〈哈姆雷特〉里找到一些你會覺得那似乎應該是屬于永恒與不朽的東西。因為它談到了人生的抉擇，談到了一個生活在特定的歷史與生活環境下的人在對他個人來言是獨特的，而對于全人類來說又是普遍的的命運面前，在只有從過去所積累的有限的經驗可以憑借與依托的情況下，所選擇的人生之路。從某種意義上說，他的經驗也代表了我們自己的經驗，他所面對的命運在我們人生的某個階段里也是我們所要面對的。我們面對絕望的存在，在矛盾中摸索真理，在迷霧中找尋真相，在兩難問題里作出行動，在一個失去標準與可以衡量標準的尺度的世界里重建價值的體系與精神大廈……

　　哈姆雷特是不完美的，有時他的抉擇是非理性的，相當沖動的，比如當他在激怒之下一劍刺死他誤以為是國王的波洛涅斯時，然而或許正是他這種不理智的抉擇，這種人性的弱點的表現，讓我們打心底里接受和認同他的藝術形象，因為我們常常可以在自己身上看見他的影子……

　　哈姆雷特又是極其珍視感情的，在他以裝瘋來躲避國王的迫害時，他依然抑制不住對奧菲麗亞的思念，不忍心讓她由于自己裝瘋而痛苦，而冒著受到國王懷疑的風險給她寫了一首小詩：'doubt thou the stars are fire;doubt that thesun doth move ;doubt truth to be a liar;but never doubt i love. 就是這樣，哈姆雷特在對命運的抉擇中構造了自己的悲劇，原來他完全可以屈服于自己的命運，不去探詢父王死去的真相，但哈姆雷特的性格不允許他帶著一個疑問生活在庸庸碌碌之中，所以他毅然走上了找尋真相的道路，此后，只要他所做出的任何抉擇稍有不同，他和其它人最終的命運都會改變，但是他的經驗促使他一次次作出在他認為是正確的而實際上是致命的抉擇，最后，哈姆雷特并沒有為自己的抉擇感到遺憾，他只是希望霍拉旭能為他"in this harsh world draw thybreath in pain， to tell my story." 因為每一個人的每一個抉擇都是在特定的歷史情況下唯一而不可重復的，所以在這里假設如果哈姆雷特能回過頭去重新作出抉擇，會是怎樣一種情景就毫無意義;我們每一個人也是這樣，可以說，在我們每一個人心中都有一個哈姆雷特，我們所做的每一個抉擇都是唯一的不可替代的，它將直接影響到我們未來的命運，沒有什么標準可以衡量我們的抉擇是否正確，我們也必然要接受自己的抉擇所引起的一切后果，就象哈姆雷特所說的"thingsstanding thus unknown ， shall live behind me !" 或許我們要面對的問題不是象"to be， or not to be"這么嚴重，然而，要想在這個充滿風險的混沌的世界里做好而不是做對每一個抉擇都不會容易。在一個除了目標，再也沒有任何尺度可以衡量其善惡的世界里，勇敢地作出抉擇，然后坦然地接受自己的命運，……這就是哈姆雷特永恒的魅力之所在吧?

《哈姆雷特》讀后感 篇2

　　《哈姆雷特》是莎士比亞最著名的—部悲劇，它突出地反映了作者的人文主義思想。莎士比亞說過，他的作品就是“給自然照一面鏡子，給德行看一看自己的面目，給荒唐看一看自己的姿態，給時代和社會看一看自己的形象和印記”。《哈姆雷特》正是一個時代的縮影。

　　哈姆雷特是文藝復興時期人文主義者的理想人物。他是王子，按照傳統，是王權的當然繼承者。但是，他的美好前途被顛倒了的時代顛倒了。戲一開頭，作者就展現了一幅丑惡的社會畫面：國家發生宮廷政變，國王被害，陰謀家竊取了王位;王后改嫁;滿朝臣子趨炎附勢等等。世界仿佛到了末日。于是這個王子喊出了“時代整個兒脫節了”的吼聲。人們強烈地感受到這是“時代的靈魂”本身在呼喊。哈姆雷特本是個正直、樂觀、有理想的青年，在正常的環境下，他可以成為一位賢明君主;但是現實的社會迫使他不得不裝瘋賣傻，進行復仇。他是英國那個特定的動蕩不安時代的產物。

　　在《哈姆雷特》這部戲劇中，處處可以看出作者著意把自己心目中的典型人物塑造成一個英雄形象的匠心：哈姆雷特很有心計，在敵強我弱的惡劣情況下，他敢于針鋒相對地進行斗爭，他擊破了奸王設下的—個個圈套：先是戳穿了波洛涅斯和羅森克蘭等人進行刺探和監視的把戲;又使王后發現天良;接著采用“調包計”除掉了奸王的兩個走卒，把奸王“借刀殺人”的陰謀擊得粉碎;最后“以其人之道還治其人之身”，把雙重陷阱——毒劍和毒酒還給了奸王。在每一回合的斗爭中，哈姆雷特都顯得形象高大。所以有評論說，《哈姆雷特》是一出“巨人型”的悲劇，此話不無道理。

　　但哈姆雷特決非“完人”。他雖然善于思索，卻優柔寡斷;他雖然受到人民的愛戴，卻并不相信人民。他說：“時代變得越發不像樣子，—個農民的腳趾竟然這么靠近一個朝臣的腳后跟，擦傷了后者的凍瘡。”可見哈姆雷特的社會改革與農民所要求的變革相距甚遠。盡管哈姆雷特有令人欽佩的才能，竭力想除舊布新，但他總是郁郁不樂，遲疑不決，他始終是孤立的。這就注定了他與丑惡同歸于盡的悲慘命運。

　　《哈姆雷特》描寫人物心理的語言十分豐富，這在莎士比亞所有悲劇中也是十分突出的。如哈姆雷特的性格大部分是以“瘋話”表達出來的，他的“滿口荒唐言”就像迸發出來的火花。克勞迪斯陰陽怪氣的語言則照映出了他口蜜腹劍的丑態。波洛涅斯愛用詩體語言，給人以滑稽可笑的印象。

　　總之，《哈姆雷特》是一出人文主義思想家的悲劇，是歐洲文藝復興土壤里長出來的一朵長開不敗的藝術之花，直至今天，還在散發出它所特有的馨香。

《哈姆雷特》讀后感 篇3

　　The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark, or more simply Hamlet, is a tragedy by William Shakespeare, believed to have been written between 1599 and 1601. The play, set in Denmark, recounts how Prince Hamlet exacts revenge on his uncle Claudius, who has murdered Hamlet's father, the King, and then taken the throne and married Gertrude, Hamlet's mother. The play vividly charts the course of real and feigned madness—from overwhelming grief to seething rage—and explores themes of treachery, revenge, in-ce-st, and moral corruption.

　　Despite much literary detective work, the exact year of writing remains in dispute. Three different early versions of the play have survived: these are known as the First Quarto (Q1), the Second Quarto (Q2) and the First Folio (F1). Each has lines, and even scenes, that are missing from the others. Shakespeare probably based Hamlet on the legend of Amleth, preserved by 13th-century chronicler Saxo Grammaticus in his Gesta Danorum and subsequently retold by 16th-century scholar Franois de Belleforest, and a supposedly lost Elizabethan play known today as the Ur-Hamlet.

　　Given the play's dramatic structure and depth of characterization, Hamlet can be analyzed, interpreted and argued about from many perspectives. For example, scholars have debated for centuries about Hamlet's hesitation in killing his uncle. Some see it as a plot device to prolong the action, and others see it as the result of pressure exerted by the complex philosophical and ethical issues that surround cold-blooded murder, calculated revenge and thwarted desire. More recently, psychoanalytic critics have examined Hamlet's unconscious desires, and feminist critics have re-evaluated and rehabilitated the often maligned characters of Ophelia and Gertrude.

　　Hamlet is Shakespeare's longest play and among the most powerful and influential tragedies in the English language. It provides a storyline capable of "seemingly endleretelling and adaptation by others". During Shakespeare's lifetime, the play was one of his most popular works, and it still ranks high among his most-performed, topping, for example, the Royal Shakespeare Company's list since 1879. It has inspired writers from Goethe and Dickens to Joyce and Murdoch and has been described as "the world's most filmed story after Cinderella". The title role was almost certainly created for Richard Burbage, the leading tragedian of Shakespeare's time. In the four hundred years since, it has been played by highly acclaimed actors, and sometimes actresses, of each successive age.

　　" Hamlet " of Shakespear is a classical representative work. This book certainly does not have the big difference in the superficial plot with the historical fable, spoke or the Danish prince the story which revenged for the father, in which fills the rank smell of blood violence and dies.Just like the dramatis personae Horatio said: " you may hear to to rape massacre, the unusual repair behavior, the dark center decision, accidental slaughter, borrows the hand murder , as well as falls into suicide result." Windingly elects the plot, tightly centers on the revenge to launch. Hamlet Wittenberg hurries back the home in a hurry from Germany, is attends his father's funeral, enables him to accept, he not catches up with father's funeral, actually witnessed the mother and the Uncle Claudius' wedding ceremony, this had caused Hamm the Wright suspicion at the heart, added night above meets in the royal palace castle with father's ghost, the ghost sorrow sued, this pile atrocity was Uncle Hamlet the behavior, and wanted him to revenge for the father.To this, he started the difficult revenge course, launched the life and death contest with Claudius. Finally, sent out sword the revenge to Claudius.

　　Hamlet is a man with contradictory,he had many chances to kill Claudius,but he hesitated,which reflects the religious thought poisons.